Cases 31 - 40 of 43
Sims v. Thomas et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2012cv00448
Plaintiff:
Terry Dean Sims
Defendant:
Kim Tobias Thomas, Gary Hetzel and Alabama Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Yahola v. Bentley, et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2012cv00320
Plaintiff:
Tacoma Alexander Yahola
Defendant:
Robert Bentley, Luther Strange and Kim Tobias Thomas
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jamison v. Thomas et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2012cv00150
Plaintiff:
Samuel E. Jamison, Sr.
Defendant:
Kim Tobias Thomas, Anthony (Supervisor) and Union Springs Housing Authority
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Watson v. Danford et al
as 2:2012cv00216
Plaintiff:
Terry Donnell Watson
Defendant:
Robert Danford, State of Alabama, Luther Strange and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Watson v. Thomas et al (INMATE1)
as 2:2011cv00938
Plaintiff:
Terry Donnell Watson
Defendant:
Kim Tobias Thomas, Cheryl Price, Dewayne Estes and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hollins v. Thomas et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2011cv00890
Plaintiff:
Terrence Legerald Hollins
Defendant:
Kim Tobias Thomas, Jeffrey Williams, Louis Boyd and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Melvin v. Thomas et al
as 2:2011cv00796
Plaintiff:
Mark Melvin
Defendant:
Kim Tobias Thomas , Richard Allen , Bobby Barrett and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Maddox v. Thomas et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2011cv00787
Plaintiff:
Chris Maddox
Defendant:
Kim Tobias Thomas, Jeffery Williams, Louis Boyd and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Montgomery v. Alabama Department of Corrections et al (INMATE1)
as 2:2011cv00757
Plaintiff:
Marshall Montgomery
Defendant:
Alabama Department of Corrections, Kim Tobias Thomas, J. C. Giles and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McAteer v. Daniels, et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2011cv00630
Plaintiff:
Roy Lee McAteer
Defendant:
Leeposey Daniels and Kim Tobias Thomas
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
