Cases 31 - 40 of 109
Wilgis v. Warden Colbourne
as 1:2021cv01236
Plaintiff:
Lewis Edward Wilgis
Defendant:
Warden Colbourne
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Beckwitt v. Smith et al
as 1:2021cv00578
Plaintiff:
Daniel Lewis Beckwitt
Defendant:
Michele Smith, A non-zero quantity of John Doe Judge(s) for the Circuit Court of Montgomery County, MD and An unknown quantity of John Doe defendants
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Sims-Lewis v. Arresting Officer
as 1:2021cv00571
Plaintiff:
Raymond Sims-Lewis
Defendant:
Arresting Officer
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Bridgeford v. D.P.S.C.S. Patuxent Staff et al
as 8:2021cv00222
Plaintiff:
Douglass Bridgeford
Defendant:
Sgt. Jobe, Capt. Glasgow, D.P.S.C.S. Patuxent Staff and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Lewis v. SSA
as 8:2020cv02903
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Lewis
Defendant:
SSA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
White v. United States Of America et al
as 8:2020cv02653
Defendant:
Department of Justice, Ashland Federal Correctional Institution, United States Of America and others
Plaintiff:
John David White
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Beckwitt v. Montgomery County et al
as 8:2020cv02639
Defendant:
Maryland Montgomery County, Anne Arundel County Maryland, Amanda Kraemer and others
Plaintiff:
Daniel Lewis Beckwitt
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Lewis v. Maryland State et al
as 1:2020cv00343
Defendant:
ECI, Kevin Teves, Mark Schoenfelder and others
Plaintiff:
Raymond Lewis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Burral v. Jones et al
as 1:2019cv02621
Defendant:
Brockbridge Correctional Facility, Jessup, Maryland, Unnamed members of the supervisory team, John Doe Warden #1 and others
Plaintiff:
Lewis William Burral and Lewis Burral
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Sims-Lewis v. Trader et al
as 1:2019cv02001
Defendant:
Gov. Larry Hogan, Lt. Johnson, Ms. McCabe and others
Plaintiff:
Raymond Eugene Sims-Lewis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
