Cases 31 - 40 of 248
HAQQ v. WARREN COUNTY et al
as 3:2021cv17202
Plaintiff:
Jeremiah P Haqq and JEREMIAH P. HAQQ
Defendant:
WARREN COUNTY and WARREN COUNTY CORRECTIONAL CENTER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
MUNN v. CAPE MAY COUNTY CORRECTIONAL CENTER et al
as 1:2021cv15941
Plaintiff:
JOSHUA P. MUNN
Defendant:
TRISH C., MARLYN, LT. PRINCE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CRAWLEY v. BURRESS et al
as 1:2021cv14524
Plaintiff:
SHAQUILLE P. CRAWLEY
Defendant:
C.O. S. BURRESS, SERGEANT M. PEER and SERGEANT T. BENSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CRAWLEY v. WILLIAM et al
as 1:2021cv14526
Plaintiff:
SHAQUILLE P. CRAWLEY
Defendant:
SERGEANT T. WILLIAM, C.O. M. LEWIS and SERGEANT M. DUNN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
OJO v. BERGEN COUNTY, et al
as 2:2021cv11359
Defendant:
MICHAEL TSIOLAS, STEVEN AHRENDT, P. ALLEGRETTA and others
Plaintiff:
OLUKAYODE DAVID OJO
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
OJO v. HUDSON COUNTY et al
as 2:2021cv11360
Defendant:
RONALD P. EDWARDS, WOODLEY, D'ANDREA and others
Plaintiff:
OLUKAYODE DAVID OJO
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CARATINI v. POWELL et al
as 1:2021cv11061
Defendant:
WILLIE BONDS, SGT. D. SHEEHAN, SGT. D. CAIN and others
Plaintiff:
PETER L. CARATINI
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BUSS v. FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS et al
as 1:2021cv07590
Defendant:
CASE MANAGER CRAMER, CARVAJAL, M.D., COUNSELOR BROWN and others
Plaintiff:
JOSHUA BUSS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
WELCH v. COUNTY OF BURLINGTON et al
as 1:2021cv04526
Defendant:
CORRECTIONAL OFFICERS JANE & jOHN DOE(S) 1 THROUGH 10, COUNTY EMPLOYEES JANE & JOHN DOE(S) 1 THROUGH 10, LIUETENANT R. CLUGSTEN and others
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER M. WELCH
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
RILEY v. TARANTINO et al
as 1:2020cv18864
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM RILEY
Defendant:
PTL. B CARUSO JR., JUDGE MARK P. TARATINO and MARK P. TARANTINO
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
