Cases 31 - 40 of 64
Rivera v. United States of America
as 1:2013cv12981
Plaintiff:
Victor Rivera
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Aldrich v. United States of America
as 1:2013cv12085
Plaintiff:
Robert Aldrich
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Vargas v. United States of America et al
as 1:2013cv11458
Plaintiff:
Harry Vargas
Defendant:
United States of America, Federal Bureau of Prisons, MDC Broooklyn Federal Detention Center and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mahoney v. United States of America
as 1:2013cv11443
Defendant:
United States of America
Plaintiff:
Brian Edward Mahoney
Cause Of Action: Certification of Dangerousness Due to Mental Disease or Defect
Mahoney v. United States of America
as 1:2013cv11094
Plaintiff:
Brian Edward Mahoney
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Phelps v. United States of America et al
as 1:2013cv10331
Plaintiff:
Coy Phelps
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Malouf v. Devens F.M.C et al
as 1:2013cv10036
Plaintiff:
Michael J. Malouf
Defendant:
Devens F.M.C, Turner, Lopez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McMann et al v. United States of America
as 1:2012cv11872
Plaintiff:
Paul J. McMann
Defendant:
United States of America and Eric Holder
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Barrett v. United States of America Bureau of Prisons
as 1:2012cv11726
Plaintiff:
Jeffery Barrett
Defendant:
J. Grondolsky, United States of America Bureau of Prisons, Federal Medical Center-Devens and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gaither v. United States of America
as 1:2012cv11456
Plaintiff:
Nathaniel Gaither
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
