Cases 31 - 40 of 83
Edwards v. Proud et al
as 1:2016cv02161
Plaintiff:
Karl Bruce Edwards
Defendant:
Proud, Fuller, ., M. S. Moubarek, MD and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Goode v. Baltimore City Circuit Court et al
as 1:2015cv02641
Plaintiff:
Abraham Goode
Defendant:
Baltimore City Circuit Court, Unknown Baltimore City Police Officers, Baltimore City Police Department and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Green v. The United States of America
as 1:2015cv02026
Plaintiff:
Preston Sean Green
Defendant:
The United States of America
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gill v. United States of America et al
as 1:2015cv00829
Defendant:
United States of America and U.S. Parole and Probation
Plaintiff:
Raymond Edward Gill
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Tawney v. United States of America
as 8:2015cv00161
Petitioner:
Ralph Tawney
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gill v. United States of America et al
as 1:2015cv00111
Plaintiff:
Raymond Edward Gill
Defendant:
United States of America, US Parole and Probation and CJA-Attorney
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gill v. United States of America, et al.
as 1:2015cv00110
Plaintiff:
Raymond Edward Gill
Defendant:
United States of America, CJA-Attorney and U.S. Marshal's
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Marsh v. United States Of America et al
as 8:2014cv03559
Plaintiff:
Guy Marsh
Defendant:
United States Of America, U.S. Department of Justice, Eric Wilson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Bivens-Prisoner
Gill v. United States of America
as 1:2014cv02809
Plaintiff:
Raymond Edward Gill
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Gill v. United States of America et al
as 1:2014cv02810
Plaintiff:
Raymond Edward Gill
Defendant:
United States of America, US Assistance Attorney, John Albert and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
