Cases 41 - 50 of 109
CIRCLE SEVEN EL-RUKN et al v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE et al
as 2:2016cv00204
Plaintiff:
AMERICAN ORTHODOX ISLAM, THOMAS L. BATES and CIRCLE SEVEN EL-RUKN
Defendant:
M. CAULTON, J. D. EDWARDS, M. JONES and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
GATES v. LEMMON et al
as 1:2016cv00710
Defendant:
H. BRACKET, CHAPLAIN, GRIEVANCE OFFICE and others
Plaintiff:
JOHN GATES
Miscellaneou:
PENDLETON CF (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
EARLY v. SHEPHERD et al
as 2:2016cv00085
Defendant:
IAN CONNORS, PAUL M. LAIRD, LEANN LARIVA and others
Plaintiff:
LOUIS H. EARLY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Lindsey v. Basinger et al
as 3:2016cv00094
Miscellaneous_party:
WESTVILLE E-FILE(Court Use Only)
Plaintiff:
Joshua P Lindsey
Defendant:
James Basinger and William H Wilson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
REDMOND v. COX et al
as 1:2016cv00311
Defendant:
AARON COX, HILSON and ROBERT STAFFORD
Plaintiff:
JOHN H. REDMOND, IV
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
REDMOND v. UPCHURCH et al
as 1:2016cv00257
Defendant:
PALMER and UPCHURCH
Plaintiff:
JOHN H. REDMOND, IV
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
ARCHAMBAULT v. UNNAMED OFFICER
as 1:2015cv01935
Plaintiff:
JAMES H. ARCHAMBAULT
Defendant:
UNNAMED OFFICER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Thomas v. Mazick et al
as 3:2015cv00548
Plaintiff:
Leonard Thomas
Defendant:
Brad S Mazick, Barbara Eichman MD, Nicholas P Wardell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Caudill v. Officer Hayes et al
as 1:2015cv00263
Plaintiff:
Nathan Caudill and Rodney Smith
Defendant:
IA Officer Hayes, Officer Chuck Weiland , Captain Reeves and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ARCHAMBAULT v. UNKNOWN OFFICERS
as 2:2015cv00281
Plaintiff:
JAMES H. ARCHAMBAULT
Defendant:
UNKNOWN OFFICERS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
