Cases 41 - 50 of 400
Smith #267009 v. Otto et al
as 1:2022cv01028
Plaintiff:
RESTRICTED FILER Derrick Lee Smith #267009
Defendant:
Mary Otto, Michigan Department of Corrections, Michigan Department of Corrections Office of Legal Affairs and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Henderson v. Palmer et al
as 2:2022cv12322
Plaintiff:
Darquarion Henderson
Defendant:
Unknown Palmer, Unknown Simmit, Unknown Qualls and others
Carrodine v. Michigan Department of Correction's State Prison et al
as 2:2022cv12265
Plaintiff:
James Edward Carrodine
Defendant:
Michigan Department of Correction's State Prison, Macomb Correctional Facility Employee's Food Service Department, Brandon Warriner and others
Joe v. Michigan Department of Corrections et al
as 4:2022cv12085
Plaintiff:
Michael Anthony Joe
Defendant:
Michigan Department of Corrections and Heidi E. Washington
White v. Michigan Department of Corrections et al
as 2:2022cv12047
Plaintiff:
Mark White
Defendant:
Michigan Department of Corrections, S. Landfair and Unknown Mosely
Hill #311151 v. Michigan Department of Corrections et al
as 1:2022cv00776
Plaintiff:
Tyrone Hill #311151
Defendant:
Michigan, State of, Michigan Department of Corrections and Michigan Parole Board
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Karklin v. Winn et al
as 2:2022cv11970
Plaintiff:
James Roy Karklin
Defendant:
O'Bell Winn, Gary Miniard, Carroll Walker and others
Nelson v. Michigan Department of Correction
as 3:2022cv11903
Plaintiff:
DeAndre L. Nelson
Defendant:
Michigan Department of Correction
Price v. Department of Corrections et al
as 2:2022cv11872
Plaintiff:
Robert Joseph Lewis Price
Defendant:
Department of Corrections, St. Louis Central Michigan Correctional Facility and Bellamy Creek Correctional Facility
Phinisee v. Michigan Department of Corrections
as 4:2022cv11699
Plaintiff:
Travis Phinisee
Defendant:
Michigan Department of Corrections
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
