Cases 41 - 50 of 235
Flores v. Young et al
as 1:2021cv00146
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Prisons and K Young
Plaintiff:
Wilmer Flores
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Denton v. Federal Bureau of Prisons et al
as 1:2021cv00140
Plaintiff:
Ricky Denton
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Prisons and Warden of USP Beaumont
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Robertson v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 3:2021cv00061
Plaintiff:
Rafael Robertson
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Prisons and UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McClinton et al v. Federal Bureau of Prisons et al
as 1:2021cv00003
Plaintiff:
Kenosha McClinton and Jacques Miranda
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Prisons, BMM and Beaumont Medium Prison
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Edwards v. Federal Bureau of Prisons
as 4:2020cv04338
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Prisons
Plaintiff:
Amber Chevon Edwards
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kidd v. Federal Bureau of Prisons
as 2:2020cv00295
Plaintiff:
Carlos Kidd
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Prisons
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Looper v. Federal Bureau of Prisons et al
as 1:2020cv00546
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Prisons, Carroll Ellis Hayes, Dallas B Jones and others
Plaintiff:
Delores Looper
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Denton v. Federal Bureau of Prisons et al
as 1:2020cv00477
Respondent:
Federal Bureau of Prisons and Warden Shultz
Plaintiff:
Ricky Denton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Denton v. Federal Bureau of Prisons et al
as 4:2020cv03930
Plaintiff:
Ricky Denton
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Prisons and Warden Shultz
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Harris v. United States Department of Justice et al
as 1:2020cv00361
Plaintiff:
Silas Harris
Defendant:
U S Bureau of Prisons, Director of Federal Bureau of Prisons, FNU Miles and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
