Civil Rights Cases filed in Indiana
Cases 41 - 50 of 52
CARROLL v. RODDEN et al
as 4:2008cv00154
Plaintiff: RODNEY WAYNE CARROLL
Defendant: DANIEL RODDEN, RICK ELLIOTT, SAM BEARD and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
WASHINGTON v. RODDEN et al
as 4:2008cv00153
Plaintiff: KRISTOPHER L. WASHINGTON
Defendant: DANIEL RODDEN, RICK ELLIOTT, SAM BEARD and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
PARIS v. RODDEN et al
as 4:2008cv00155
Plaintiff: JAMES ROBERT PARIS
Defendant: DANIEL RODDEN, RICK ELLIOTT, SAM BEARD and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
ROBY v. RODDEN et al
as 4:2008cv00107
Plaintiff: DUWARD T. ROBY
Defendant: DANIEL RODDEN, RICK ELLIOTT, SAM BEARD and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
ROBY et al v. RODDEN et al
as 4:2008cv00108
Plaintiff: DUWARD T. ROBY and DOGGENDORF
Defendant: DANIEL RODDEN, RICK ELLIOTT, SAM BEARD and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
MCINTOSH v. LAPPIN et al
as 2:2008cv00071
Plaintiff: CARL MCINTOSH
Defendant: HARLEY G. LAPPIN, ALBERTO R. GONZALES, MICHAEL MUSKASEY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Link v. Rhymer et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2007cv00339
Plaintiff: Ray Link
Defendant: Toby H Rhymer, John A Gonzales, Rick Tindally and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
IBRAHIM v. VEACH et al
as 2:2007cv00330
Plaintiff: JIBRIL LUGMAN IBRAHIM
Defendant: RICK V. VEACH, MICHAEL NALLEY and FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
GEORGE WILLIE BURFORD III v. VEACH
as 2:2007cv00307
Plaintiff: GEORGE WILLIE BURFORD III
Defendant: RICK VEACH
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
DAVIS v. ARNETT et al
as 2:2007cv00292
Plaintiff: EDWIN G DAVIS
Defendant: KENNETH ARNETT, TIMOTHY SWAN, KEVIN TOMLINSON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?