Cases 41 - 50 of 233
SLACKFORD v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 1:2021cv17769
Plaintiff:
KEVIN SLACKFORD
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, DR. LIMBERKAR, DR. S. MCGANN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
VAUGHN v. KIEL et al
as 3:2021cv15194
Plaintiff:
LAMONT VAUGHN
Defendant:
MAGISTRATE JUDGE EDWARD KIEL, MARGARET ANN MAHONEY, PATRICK HATTERSLY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
JOHNSON v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 3:2021cv12013
Defendant:
JUDGE PAUL INNES, MICHAEL D. GRILLO, ASSISTANT PROSPECTOR AMANDA NINI and others
Plaintiff:
WENDELL JOHNSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BELSKIS v. ORTIZ et al
as 1:2021cv10322
Defendant:
KEVIN CASSANO, CARL SCEUSA, MD, NICOLETTA TURNER-FOSTER, MD and others
Plaintiff:
JOSEPH EDWARD BOVIN BELSKIS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WELCH v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 2:2021cv10866
Defendant:
WARDEN GUY CIRILLO, UNITED STATES MARSHALS SERVICE, U.S DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE and others
Plaintiff:
LAKIESTE WELCH
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WEST v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 2:2021cv10907
Plaintiff:
LAMAR WEST
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HASTINGS v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 1:2021cv09966
Defendant:
FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS and UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Plaintiff:
ROBERT ELLIS HASTINGS, JR.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
TORRES v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 2:2021cv03586
Plaintiff:
JOSE TORRES
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, WARDEN GUY CIRILLO, UNITED STATES MARSHALS SERVICE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
RAMIREZ v. THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 2:2021cv09401
Respondent:
THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Petitioner:
NARCISO RAMIREZ
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
IMES v. THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 2:2021cv11062
Plaintiff:
TERRENCE IMES
Defendant:
THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
