Civil Rights Cases filed in Texas
Cases 41 - 50 of 370
Sanchez v. Stephens
as 6:2016cv00296
Plaintiff: Ricardo Enriquez Sanchez
Defendant: William Stephens
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Decker v. Stephens et al
as 4:2016cv02175
Plaintiff: Kurby G Decker
Defendant: William Stephens , Blake H Norman , Randall L Parker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Blank v. Williams et al
as 1:2016cv00142
Plaintiff: David Vern Blank
Defendant: William Stephens, Pedro Gonzalez, Monte Baker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wilson v. Livingston et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2016cv00188
Plaintiff: Lamont E Wilson
Defendant: Brad Livingston and William Stephens
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Debose v. TDCJ Parole Division et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2016cv02120
Petitioner: Leroy Debose
Defendant: TDCJ Parole Division, William Stephens, Stewart Jenkins and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sarkozy v. Stephens
as 4:2016cv02028
Plaintiff: Romero Sarkozy
Defendant: William Stephens
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sarkozy v. Stephens We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2016cv01873
Plaintiff: Romero Sarkozy
Defendant: William Stephens
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Tatum et al v. Slyger et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 9:2016cv00095
Plaintiff: Julius Tatum, II, Marlon D Thomas, Waymond Jackson and others
Respondent: Slyger and William Stephens
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Vanover v. Stephens et al
as 4:2016cv01694
Plaintiff: William Vanover
Defendant: William Stephens, Castleberry and Oberandzie
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Tatum et al v. Slyger et al
as 4:2016cv01697
Plaintiff: Julius Tatum, II, Marlon D Thomas, Waymond Jackson and others
Defendant: Slyger and William Stephens
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?