Cases 51 - 60 of 794
Oliver v. Collier et al
as 6:2023cv00715
Plaintiff:
James Oliver
Defendant:
Bryan Collier, Warden Michael B. Gruver, Asst. Warden Jonathan W. Clark and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McGrew v. Collier et al
as 4:2023cv01155
Plaintiff:
Andrew McGrew
Defendant:
Bryan Collier and Bryan Collins
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Howard v. Collier et al
as 1:2023cv01231
Plaintiff:
Kevin Ray Howard
Defendant:
Bryan Collier, A. Hammond and FNU Johnson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Murphy v. Lumpkin et al
as 1:2023cv01199
Plaintiff:
Jedidiah Murphy
Defendant:
Major Bobby Lumpkin, Assistant Chairman Kelly Strong, Bryan Collier and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams v. Burleson County, Texas et al
as 1:2023cv01368
Plaintiff:
Anthony Cordell Williams
Defendant:
Burleson County, Texas, Gene Hermes, Judge Reva L. Townslee Corbett and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Palomo v. Collier
as 23-40636
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Reynaldo Palomo
Defendant / Appellee:
Bryan Collier, Bobby Lumpkin, Evelyn Castro and others
Jaycox v. TDCJ ID Agency et al
as 5:2023cv00213
Plaintiff:
Floyd Junior Jaycox
Defendant:
TDCJ ID Agency, Bryan Collier, John Lopez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cobb v. Collier et al
as 7:2023cv00121
Plaintiff:
Raymond Cobb
Defendant:
Bryan Collier, Warden J Smith, Sr and Sgt. Rushing
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cobb v. Collier et al;
as 2:2023cv00281
Plaintiff:
Raymond Cobb
Defendant:
Director of TDCJ Bryan Collier, Warden J Smith, Sr and Sgt. Rushing
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Brooks v. Collier et al
as 5:2023cv01154
Plaintiff:
Sherman D. Brooks
Defendant:
Bryan Collier, Edmundo Cueto, Jr. and Cirildo Puente, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
