Cases 51 - 60 of 101
Washington v. Charles County Sheriff's Dept. et al
as 1:2018cv02563
Defendant:
Charles County Sheriff's Dept., Judge Talley, John & Jane Does and others
Plaintiff:
Darrin Winston Washington
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Davis v. Director of BOP et al
as 1:2018cv02469
Defendant:
Cantum, Michael Sample, Hersh Berger and others
Plaintiff:
William Scott Davis, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Hall et al v. Rowe et al
as 1:2018cv02167
Defendant:
Jane Doe, Correct Care Solutions and Warden Major C. Rowe
Plaintiff:
Jack Phillips, Daymein Brown, D'Andre Gibson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Roberts et al v. St. Amand et al
as 1:2018cv02061
Plaintiff:
Daniel Deburgo, Brandon Roberts and Patrick Nerette
Defendant:
John./Jane Doe, Carolyn Atkins, Chief Security Frank Bishop, Jr. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Doe v. DeWees et al
as 8:2018cv02014
Defendant:
Michael Andrews, Unidentified contractor, Joyce Schaum and others
Plaintiff:
Jane Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
McManus v. Moss et al
as 1:2018cv00878
Plaintiff:
Kleatus McManus
Defendant:
John Moss, Carl Oltman, Wexford Health Sources, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hawkins v. Thomas et al
as 8:2018cv00092
Plaintiff:
Deangelo Donyee Hawkins
Defendant:
B. Thomas, Correct Care Solutions, Bryant and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sanchez v. Stewart et al
as 8:2017cv01916
Defendant:
Mr. Demer, Charles Samuel, Jr, Mrs. J. Hamilton-Rumer and others
Plaintiff:
Daniel Sanchez
Interested Party:
United States
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Gambino v. Hershberger et al
as 8:2017cv01701
Plaintiff:
David A. Gambino
Defendant:
Frank Hershberger, Shane Sheetz, Kristi Crites and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Grimes v. Engram et al
as 8:2017cv01480
Defendant:
Engram, Antionette Walls, Jane Doe and others
Plaintiff:
Jerome L. Grimes
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
