Cases 51 - 60 of 88
Schmidt v. Willoughby et al
as 1:2016cv00160
Plaintiff:
Justin L. Schmidt
Defendant:
Robert Willoughby , John Doe #1, John Doe #2 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Campbell v. Sharp et al
as 4:2015cv00745
Plaintiff:
Harry G Campbell, III
Defendant:
Mike Sharp, Jane Doe # 1, John Doe #1 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Esposito v. Nixon et al
as 2:2015cv04073
Plaintiff:
Vincent J Esposito
Defendant:
Jay Nixon, George Lombardi, Jason Kander and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Barnett v. Buchanan County Missouri et al
as 5:2015cv06044
Plaintiff:
Brandon Barnett
Defendant:
Buchanan County Missouri, Mike Strong, John Doe #1 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Futscher v. State of Missouri et al
as 2:2014cv04131
Plaintiff:
Jeremy Scott Futscher
Defendant:
State of Missouri, Pettis County MO, Jeff Mittelhauser and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Murphy v. Missouri Board of Probation & Parole et al
as 2:2014cv04031
Plaintiff:
Michael Dunham Murphy
Defendant:
Missouri Board of Probation & Parole, Ellis McSwain, Chuck Prior and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bell v. Scott et al
as 6:2013cv03389
Plaintiff:
Robert Bell, Jr.
Defendant:
Charles Scott, M.D., Corizon, John or Jane Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bell v. Scott et al
as 4:2013cv02097
Plaintiff:
Robert Bell, Jr.
Defendant:
Charles Scott, M.D., Corizon, John or Jane Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jones v. Boyer
as 4:2013cv01407
Plaintiff:
Orlando Jones
Defendant:
Oliver Glenn Boyer, Officers John Does 1-6, Prob. Officer Jane Doe #7 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Thomas v. Lombardi et al
as 4:2013cv00622
Plaintiff:
Michael A. Thomas, Jr.
Defendant:
George A. Lombardi, Matthew Pierce, John Doe #1 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
