Cases 51 - 60 of 85
ALLAH v. WILLIAMS et al
as 2:2015cv03516
Plaintiff:
ABDULLAH RASUL-SHABAZZ ALLAH
Defendant:
R. SETH WILLIAMS, KATHLEEN KANE and BRIAN COLEMAN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
PARKER v. MEANS et al
as 2:2015cv03266
Plaintiff:
JASON PARKER
Defendant:
RAYFORD A. MEANS, MCKINLEY, MORRIS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
TALBERT v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2015cv01718
Plaintiff:
CHARLES TALBERT
Defendant:
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, R. SETH WILLIAMS, ADAM JACKSON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WALKER v. WILLIAMS
as 2:2015cv01567
Plaintiff:
GARY WALKER
Defendant:
R. SETH WILLIAMS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rambert v. Department of Corrections et al
as 3:2015cv00320
Plaintiff:
Eric X. Rambert
Defendant:
Department of Corrections, John E. Wetzel, Andrew Filkosky and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
MOSES v. COURT ROOM 802 et al
as 2:2014cv07026
Plaintiff:
SHAWN MOSES
Defendant:
COURT ROOM 802 and SETH WILLIAMS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Eric Rambert v. Ronald Castille, et al
as 14-4618
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ERIC X. RAMBERT
Defendant:
RONALD D. CASTILLE, CITY OF PHILADELPHIA DISTRICT ATTORNEY OFFICE, FORMER DISTRICT ATTORNEY, INDIVIDUAL CAPACITY, SETH WILLIAMS, DISTRICT ATTORNEY, INDIVIDUAL CAPACITY, DANIEL P. MCELHATTON, ASST. DISTRICT ATTORNEY, INDIVIDUAL CAPACITY and others
CHAVIS v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2014cv06757
Plaintiff:
RONALD CHAVIS
Defendant:
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, NUTTER, SETH WILLIAMS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
JORDAN v. WILLIAMS
as 2:2014cv06669
Plaintiff:
THOMAS JORDAN
Defendant:
SETH WILLIAMS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WALKER v. WILLIAMS et al
as 2:2014cv06586
Plaintiff:
CRAIG CLAY WALKER
Defendant:
SETH WILLIAMS and THE CHIEF OF POLICE OF THE PHILADELPHIA PLOLICE DEPARTMENT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
