Cases 61 - 70 of 76
Schmaling v. Allen et al
as 2:2012cv00094
Plaintiff:
Ricky Lee Schmaling
Defendant:
Gail Allen and State of Wisconsin Division of Probation & Parole
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dietzen v. Brown County Jail et al
as 2:2011cv00538
Plaintiff:
Julie Dietzen
Defendant:
Brown County Jail, HPL Medical, Captain Malcolmson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Henkel v. Bertram et al
as 2:2011cv00303
Plaintiff:
Allen H Henkel
Defendant:
Anthony Bertram, Captain Imler and John Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bahr, Gregory v. Erickson, Thomas
as 3:2010cv00377
Plaintiff:
Gregory Allen Bahr
Defendant:
Thomas Lee Erickson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kennedy, Alvernest v. Jenkins, Warden et al
as 3:2010cv00366
Plaintiff:
Alvernest Kennedy
Defendant:
Warden Jenkins , Warden Dittman , Hess and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Marshall, David v. Barb, Nurse et al
as 3:2010cv00357
Plaintiff:
David W. Marshall, Jr.
Defendant:
Nurse Barb, Jane Doe, Paul Westerhaus and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Euclide v. Jefferson County, Wisconsin et al
as 3:2010cv00008
Plaintiff:
Nicholas Allen Euclide
Defendant:
Jefferson County, Wisconsin, Jefferson County Jail, Jefferson County Jail Dietician and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Pilcher v. U.S. Federal Court, Greenville, MS et al
as 3:2009cv00336
Plaintiff:
Orlando Lewayne Pilcher
Defendant:
U.S. Federal Court, Greenville, MS, Allen Pepper Jr. & Administration, Ricky Banks and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Allen v. Department of Corrections et al
as 3:2008cv00665
Plaintiff:
Matthew Allen
Defendant:
Department of Corrections, Rick Raemish and Matt Haneman
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Allen v. Dalbec et al
as 3:2008cv00577
Plaintiff:
Alfonzo Jermont Allen
Defendant:
Tom Dalbec and J. Ruikka
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
