Cases 61 - 67 of 67
Justice Allah v. George Hayman, et al
as 10-3359
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JUSTICE RASIDEEN ALLAH
Defendant - Appellee:
GEORGE HAYMAN, COMMISSIONER - NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, MICHELE R. RICCI, ADMINSTRATOR, NEW JERSEY STATE PRISON, JEFFREY BELL, ASSISTANT ADMINISTRATOR NEW JERSEY STATE PRISON and others
DURHAM v. NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 2:2009cv04314
Plaintiff:
MILTON PAUL DURHAM
Defendant:
NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, NEW JERSEY STATE PRISONS, MICHELLE R. RICCI and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
SIMMONS v. STATE OF NEW JERSEY, DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 3:2009cv03483
Plaintiff:
BRIAN SIMMONS
Defendant:
STATE OF NEW JERSEY, DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, NEW JERSEY STATE PRISON and MEDICAL DEPARTMENT, U.M.D.N.J.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Frederick Hedgespeth v. Roy Hendricks, et al
as 09-1314
Plaintiff - Appellant:
FREDERICK HEDGESPETH
Defendant - Appellee:
ROY L. HENDRICKS, former Administrator of New Jersey State Prison, RICHARD RUNCIE, former Chief of Custody at New Jersey State Prison, WASHINGTON, Lieutenant, New Jersey Department of Corrections and others
GARCIA v. NEW JERSEY STATE PRISON et al
as 3:2008cv05652
Plaintiff:
AGUSTIN GARCIA
Defendant:
NEW JERSEY STATE PRISON, MICHELLE RICCI, GEORGE HAYMAN and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Frederick Hedgespeth v. Roy Hendricks, et al
as 08-4155
Plaintiff - Appellant:
FREDERICK HEDGESPETH
Defendant - Appellee:
ROY L. HENDRICKS, former administrator of New Jersey State Prison, RICHARD RUNCIE, former chief of custody at New Jersey State Prison, WASHINGTON, Lieutenant, New Jersey Department of Corrections and others
HARMON v. NEW JERSEY STATE PRISON et al
as 3:2007cv02932
Plaintiff:
DERRICK HARMON
Defendant:
NEW JERSEY STATE PRISON, D.O.C., S. DAVIS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
