Cases 61 - 70 of 5,570
May v. TransUnion Credit Bureau et al
as 1:2024cv00270
Plaintiff:
Jamie Christopher May
Defendant:
TransUnion Credit Bureau and William Bill Pate
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Huey v. McCall et al
as 1:2024cv00059
Plaintiff:
William Bart Huey
Defendant:
Captain McCall and Officer McKinney
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kelly v. Bennett et al (INMATE 3)
as 2:2024cv00201
Plaintiff:
Eddie Jerome Kelly
Defendant:
Lt. Bennett, Joseph H. Headley and Warden Cargill
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Payne v. Shianna et al
as 4:2024cv00188
Plaintiff:
Markus OShea Payne
Defendant:
Shianna, Brittany, Correctional Health Care Services and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Roberts v. Segal
as 5:2024cv00309
Plaintiff:
Nicholos Kirk Roberts
Defendant:
Andrew John Segal
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Jacoby v. Dr. Fish et al
as 7:2024cv00410
Plaintiff:
Brent William Jacoby
Defendant:
Dr. Fish, Ms. Perkins and Ms. Ingram
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lucy v. Securus Technologies et al
as 1:2024cv00028
Plaintiff:
William N. Lucy
Defendant:
Securus Technologies, K. Albritton, Chairman of Board of Directors of Securus and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lewis v. Jefferson County Courthouse et al
as 2:2024cv00195
Plaintiff:
Joseph Lee Lewis, Jr
Defendant:
Jefferson County Courthouse, Jefferson County Jail, Judge Shelly Watkins and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wilkes v. Johnson et al (INMATE 4)
as 3:2024cv00139
Plaintiff:
Randall Wilkes
Defendant:
Steve Johnson, Dana Howell and Rick Chancey
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Keeton v. Maddox (INMATE 1)
as 3:2024cv00027
Plaintiff:
Raymond Mitchell Keeton
Defendant:
Andrew L. Maddox
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
