Cases 61 - 70 of 13,473
Downing v. Virginia Department of Corrections et al
as 7:2024cv00240
Plaintiff:
Lloyd Downing
Defendant:
Virginia Department of Corrections, Sean Caughron and W.R. Hensley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Waldron v. Streeval et al
as 7:2024cv00324
Plaintiff:
Rondell Waldron
Defendant:
J.C. Streeval, USP Lee, Federal Bureau of Prisons and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Wayne v. Hawes et al
as 7:2024cv00325
Plaintiff:
Robert James Wayne
Defendant:
Spencer Hawes, Kyle Irving, John Doe #1 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Carter v. Collins et al
as 7:2024cv00214
Plaintiff:
Charles Kenzell Carter
Defendant:
Collins, Williams, Neece and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Carter v. Massengill
as 7:2024cv00215
Plaintiff:
Charles Kenzell Carter
Defendant:
Massengill
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Carter v. Gilbert et al
as 7:2024cv00213
Plaintiff:
Charles Kenzell Carter
Defendant:
Gilbert, Collins, Williams and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hairston v. Henry County Adult Detention Center
as 7:2024cv00320
Plaintiff:
Jamun Daray Hairston
Defendant:
Henry County Adult Detention Center
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Turner v. Patrick County Jail et al
as 7:2024cv00322
Plaintiff:
James Jonathan Turner
Defendant:
Patrick County Jail and Jackie Bird
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kersey v. Rockbridge Regional Jail
as 7:2024cv00229
Plaintiff:
Gregory Allen Kersey
Defendant:
Rockbridge Regional Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Graves v. Adams et al
as 7:2024cv00241
Plaintiff:
Gregory Darnell Graves
Defendant:
J.R. Adams, Sgt. J. Grubb and Rick White
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
