Cases 71 - 80 of 339
Earl Wilkins v. Colette Peters, et al
as 17-35657
Plaintiff - Appellant:
EARL DOUGLAS WILKINS
Defendant - Appellee:
COLETTE PETERS, Director, Oregon Dept. Of Corrections, JEFF PREMO, Superintendent, J. NOFZIGER, Hearings Officer, OSP and others
Reeder v. Annucci
as 17-2524
Appellee:
Faruki, Great Meadow Correctional Facility, Sergeant Rodles, Upstate Correctional Facility, Kumar, Doctor; Upstate Correctional Facility and others
Defendant:
C.O. Ramsdell, Correction Officer; Upstate Correctional Facility, Deposio, Wende Correctional Facility, Anthony J. Annucci, Commissioner; Department of Corrections and others
Plaintiff:
Raszell Reeder
Abreu v. Lira
as 17-2448
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Carlos Abreu
Defendant - Appellee:
Michael J. Lira, Deputy Commissioner for Programs at Upstate Correctional Facility; sued in individual and official capacities, Gerald J. Otis, Deputy Commissioner for Administrative; Upstate Correctional Facility; sued in both individual and official capacities, David A. Rock, Superintendent of Upstate Correctional Facility; sued in both individual and official capacities and others
Defendant:
Cromp, Correctional Officer; Upstate Correctional Facility; sued in individual capacity, Constantino, Correctional Captain; Wende Correctional Facility; sued in individual and official capacities, S. Danforth, Facility Steward; Upstate Correctional Facility; sued in both individual and official capacities and others
Williams v. Nevada Department of Corrections et al
as 2:2017cv01987
Defendant:
Chief Medical Officer, Nevada Department of Corrections and Brian Williams
Plaintiff:
Michael Williams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dean Schwartzmiller v. K. Rodriguez, et al
as 17-55980
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DEAN A. SCHWARTZMILLER
Defendant - Appellee:
K. RODRIGUEZ, Psychologist at the Richard J. Donovan State Prison (RJD), JOHN LARSON, NBC News Correspondent, NBC NEWS and others
Abreu v. Lipka
as 17-2091
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Carlos Abreu
Defendant - Appellee:
Kimberly Lipka, Medical Nurse; Great Meadow Correctional Facility, Paolano, Physician Great Meadow Correctional Facility, D. Karandy, Dr.; Great Meadow Correctional Facility and others
Abreu v. Lira
as 17-1848
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Carlos Abreu
Defendant - Appellee:
Michael J. Lira, Deputy Commissioner for Programs at Upstate Correctional Facility; sued in individual and official capacities, Gerald J. Otis, Deputy Commissioner for Administrative; Upstate Correctional Facility; sued in both individual and official capacities, David A. Rock, Superintendent of Upstate Correctional Facility; sued in both individual and official capacities and others
Defendant:
Cromp, Correctional Officer; Upstate Correctional Facility; sued in individual capacity, Constantino, Correctional Captain; Wende Correctional Facility; sued in individual and official capacities, S. Danforth, Facility Steward; Upstate Correctional Facility; sued in both individual and official capacities and others
Dent v. California Department of Correction and Rehabilitation et al
as 2:2017cv01146
Plaintiff:
Brian Keith Dent
Defendant:
California Department of Correction and Rehabilitation, Scott Kern, Robert Fox and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Tyrone Wallace v. R. Olson, et al
as 17-55660
Plaintiff - Appellant:
TYRONE WALLACE
Defendant - Appellee:
R. OLSON, RJD Appeals Coordinator, J. RAMIREZ, RJD Appeals Coordinator, J. DALGLISH, RJD Psychologist and others
Samuel Anderson v. Dorothy Swingler, et al
as 17-15952
Plaintiff - Appellant:
SAMUEL ANDERSON
Defendant - Appellee:
DOROTHY SWINGLER, Chief Medical Officer and BONNIE LEE, Chief Physician and Surgeon
Defendant:
T. KIMURA-YIP, Associate Director, California Prison Health Care, J. WALKER, Chief, Office of Third Level Appeals - Health Care, N. WARREN, Chief (Acting) Office of Third Level Appeals - Health Care and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
