Cases 71 - 80 of 114
Yancey v. The People of the United States et al
as 1:2013cv00990
Plaintiff:
John B. Yancey, Sr.
Defendant:
The People of the United States, Eric Holder, Jorge S. DeRosas and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Keesh et al v. Capra et al
as 1:2013cv02040
Plaintiff:
Tyheem Y. Keesh, Roger Silvestre, Julian L. Christopher and others
Defendant:
Michael Capra, Lesley Malin, Mu'Min Hasib and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rogers v. Artus et al
as 1:2013cv00021
Plaintiff:
Eric Rogers
Defendant:
D. Artus, J. Kruger, A. Blanar and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rogers v. The City of New York et al
as 1:2012cv08307
Plaintiff:
Kevin Rogers
Defendant:
The City of New York, John Doe 1 and John Doe 2
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kunz v. Brazil et al
as 6:2012cv06570
Plaintiff:
Robert J.A. Kunz
Defendant:
Roger Brazil and Douglas D. Randle
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Weathers et al v. Travers et al
as 9:2012cv01582
Plaintiff:
Albert Weathers, James Wright, Carlos Abreu and others
Defendant:
Marla Travers, Leland P. Marlow, Elizabeth White and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rogers v. Mr. Yelich et al
as 9:2012cv01477
Plaintiff:
Jelani Rovdell Rogers
Defendant:
Mr. Yelich and Mr. Dupree
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rogers v. Mr. Yelich et al
as 1:2012cv06860
Plaintiff:
Jelani Rovdell Rogers
Defendant:
Mr. Yelich and Mr. Dupree
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rogers v. NYPD (New York City Police Department) et al
as 1:2012cv03042
Defendant:
John Doe 67th Precinct, NYPD (New York City Police Department) and New York District Attorney's Office
Plaintiff:
Ervin B. Rogers
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith v. City of New York et al
as 1:2012cv04307
Plaintiff:
Roger Smith
Defendant:
City of New York, Dora B. Schriro, Mayor Bloomberg and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
