Cases 71 - 80 of 84
JOHNSON v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 2:2009cv00139
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL JOHNSON
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
DRAPER v. HEALTH SERVICES FCC - TH et al
as 2:2009cv00118
Plaintiff:
LAYNE DRAPER
Defendant:
HEALTH SERVICES FCC - TH, ANDY RUPSKA and UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
PRUITT v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 2:2009cv00084
Plaintiff:
CURTIS L PRUITT
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
HENRY v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 2:2008cv00478
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL HENRY
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS, MARBERRY and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
PROWELL v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 2:2008cv00364
Plaintiff:
ASHAUNTI Q PROWELL
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ANOKA COUNTY, MINNESOTA, INCORPORATED, JULIE and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
WILSON et al v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 2:2008cv00167
Plaintiff:
SIDNEY WILSON and MARK T DAWSON
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, STATE OF INDIANA and MITCHELL E. DANIELS, JR.
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
GIPSON v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 2:2008cv00137
Plaintiff:
MAURICE GIPSON
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MCINTOSH v. LAPPIN et al
as 2:2008cv00071
Plaintiff:
CARL MCINTOSH
Defendant:
HARLEY G. LAPPIN, ALBERTO R. GONZALES, MICHAEL MUSKASEY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HAMMER v. WEBSTER et al
as 2:2008cv00040
Plaintiff:
DAVID PAUL HAMMER
Defendant:
THOMAS A WEBSTER, JULIE BEIGHLY, PRASHANTHI REDDY-BOLLA and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
IBRAHIM v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 2:2008cv00019
Plaintiff:
JIBRIL L. IBRAHIM
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, U. S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
