Cases 81 - 90 of 140
Maciel v. CDCR, et al.
as 1:2016cv00996
Plaintiff:
Armando Maciel
Defendant:
California Department of Corrections & Rehabilitation, Secretary of CDCR, S. Frauenheim and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Moore v. California Correctional Health Care Services et al.
as 2:2016cv01494
Plaintiff:
Duane Reed Moore, Sr.
Defendant:
California Correctional Health Care Services and Secretary of CDCR
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Forbes v. Patel, et al.
as 1:2016cv00707
Plaintiff:
Robert Forbes
Defendant:
Patel, G Harishkumar, Wasco State Prison Warden and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bealer v. Secretary of California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation et al
as 1:2016cv00671
Plaintiff:
Antwoine Bealer
Defendant:
Secretary of California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation and Warden of Kern Valley State Prison
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ferdinand Reynolds v. Calif Dept of Corrections Secretary
as 2:2016cv02505
Defendant:
Calif Dept of Corrections Secretary
Plaintiff:
Ferdinand Reynolds
Patterson v. CDCR, et al
as 2:2016cv00368
Plaintiff:
Vester L. Patterson
Defendant:
CDCR , Suzanne Hubbard and Secretary of CDCR
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Jose Manuel Lopez v. City of Santa Ana et al
as 8:2016cv00172
Respondent:
T R Basham, Best Best and Krieger LLP, Jeff Bowman and others
Petitioner:
Jose Manuel Lopez
Mehmood v. Chavez et al
as 2:2015cv01695
Plaintiff:
Yasir Mehmood
Defendant:
Michael Chavez, United States of America, Obama and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kenneth Moore Jr. v. Edmund G Brown Jr. et al
as 2:2015cv05603
Defendant:
Governor Edmund G. Brown, Jr., Director of Adult Institutions, Correctional Officer Kinder and others
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Moore, Jr.
Cassells v. Secretary of California Department of Correction and Rehabilitation
as 2:2015cv01446
Defendant:
Secretary of California Department of Correction and Rehabilitation
Plaintiff:
Keith Michael Cassells
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
