Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Muse v. Corrections Corporation of America et al
as 3:2023cv00588
Plaintiff:
Gavin Muse
Defendant:
Corrections Corporation of America doing business as CoreCivic, Jerry Wardlow, f/n/u Thomas and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Carter v. Lawrence et al
as 3:2022cv00730
Plaintiff:
Antonius Carter
Defendant:
Mimi Lawrence, Chief Austin Boldie, Corporal Eric Yevin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Brooks v. Eichstaedt, et al
as 3:2019cv00515
Defendant:
f/n/u Grant, f/n/u Thomas, f/n/u Cole and others
Plaintiff:
Christopher Broots and Christopher Brooks
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Blake v. Tennessee Department of Correction et al
as 1:2018cv00017
Plaintiff:
Deandre Blake
Defendant:
Dustin Mackin, f/n/u Thomas, Unnamed Member #1 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bundren v. Hallbrooks et al
as 1:2017cv00016
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Bundren
Defendant:
Daniel Hallbrooks, (f/n/u) Thomas and (f/n/u) Mackin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Crockett v. Hawkins et al
as 3:2016cv02059
Plaintiff:
Corey Crockett
Defendant:
Kizzy Hawkins, f/n/u Thomas, f/n/u Rycher and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Author Turner v. Dan Weikal, et al
as 14-5264
Plaintiff - Appellee:
AUTHOR RAY TURNER
Defendant - Appellant:
DAN WEIKAL, Administrator of CJC, K. COX, Director of Operations - Hill Detention Center, PAM HALE, Hill Detention Center Administrator and others
Defendant:
ABL FOOD SERVICES, et al.
Turner v. Welkal et al
as 3:2012cv00915
Plaintiff:
Author Ray Turner
Defendant:
Dan Welkal, K. Cox, Granvisse Earl-Young and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bumpas v. Corrections Corporation of America et al
as 3:2010cv00061
Plaintiff:
Darrell W. Bumpas
Defendant:
Corrections Corporation of America, Metropolitan Government of Nashville & Davidson County, Brian Koehn and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
