Cases 1 - 10 of 39,980
Bennett v. Abebe et al
as 1:2024cv00093
Plaintiff:
Kevin Dean Bennett
Defendant:
FNU Abebe and Dr. Christopher S Eddleman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Garza v. Bishop et al
as 4:2024cv00571
Plaintiff:
Raul Villegas Garza
Defendant:
Doctor FNU Bishop, Nurse Rachel LNU and Nurse FNU Zeorgetta
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Diaz v. Plainview Police Department et al
as 5:2024cv00143
Plaintiff:
David Rex Diaz
Defendant:
Plainview Police Department, Jesse Ortiz and Corporal of Plainview Police Department Night Shift
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Simpson et al v. Montford Unit Officials
as 5:2024cv00144
Plaintiff:
Scott Simpson, Clark Beckett, Carlton Mack and others
Defendant:
Montford Unit Officials
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plattenburg v. Stiles Unit et al
as 1:2024cv00237
Plaintiff:
Quinton Plattenburg
Respondent:
Stiles Unit and Thomas
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ewing v. Back et al
as 3:2024cv00175
Plaintiff:
Steven Guy Ewing
Defendant:
J. Back and Tammy W. Jefferson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
v. Caldwell et al
as 5:2024cv00082
Defendant:
Robert Caldwell, Kody R. Shur, Garrett Saxton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bello v. USA et al
as 4:2024cv00554
Petitioner:
Olamide Olatayo Bello
Respondent:
USA and Eastern District Court of Texas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Callicotte v. Collier et al
as 1:2024cv00234
Plaintiff:
Jason Colby Callicotte
Defendant:
Bryan Collier, Bobby Lumpkin, J. Back and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dingle v. Smith et al
as 1:2024cv00236
Plaintiff:
Marthur L Dingle
Defendant:
Phillip C Smith, Jr, Raquel West and Zena Stephens
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
