Cases 1 - 10 of 36
CARATINI v. POWELL et al
as 1:2021cv11061
Defendant:
WILLIE BONDS, SGT. D. SHEEHAN, SGT. D. CAIN and others
Plaintiff:
PETER L. CARATINI
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
GIORDANO v. TOWNSHIP OF TOMS RIVER et al
as 3:2020cv18432
Defendant:
J. EVERETT, R. RAHNER, A. PACIULLI and others
Plaintiff:
DAVID GIORDANO
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
OLIVER v. NJ D.O.C CENTRAL TRANSPORTATION et al
as 2:2020cv14941
Plaintiff:
QUINCY OLIVER
Defendant:
JOHN DOE OFFICER 1, JOHN DOE OFFICER 2 and NJ D.O.C CENTRAL TRANSPORTATION
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CARATINI v. POWELL et al
as 1:2020cv08924
Defendant:
DAVID METELOW, ASST. SUPERINTENDENT LISA SWIFT, SCO. APRIL WASHINGTON and others
Plaintiff:
PETER L. CARATINI
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
IBRAHIM v. MEO et al
as 2:2020cv01705
Defendant:
NICOLAUS KUELN, Deputy KING, OFC. GUTOWSKI and others
Plaintiff:
YUSUF IBRAHIM
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
LEWIS v. STATE OF NEW JERSEY et al
as 1:2019cv20490
Defendant:
PHIL MURPHY, GURBIR GREWAL, NEW JERSEY BOARD OF MEDICAL EXAMINERS and others
Plaintiff:
KENNETH LEWIS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
HESTER v. MURPHY et al
as 2:2019cv04521
Defendant:
ATTORNEY GENERAL GURBIR, WHARTON POLICE DEPT., ROBERT ASARO-ANGELO and others
Plaintiff:
MELVIN D. HESTER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
GLADDEN v. NEW JERSEY STATE POLICE et al
as 3:2018cv13363
Defendant:
JOHN CIPOT, ANDREW OLIVARAH, DAN COLLONEY and others
Plaintiff:
CARAN A. GLADDEN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
EDWARDS v. BILLMEIER et al
as 3:2018cv01857
Plaintiff:
MACK EDWARDS
Defendant:
ROBERT BILLMEIER, MICHAEL GRILLO, MICHELLE GASPARIAN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BATSCH v. COUNTY OF MERCER et al
as 3:2017cv07770
Plaintiff:
KYLE W BATSCH
Defendant:
COUNTY OF MERCER, CHARLES ELLIS and PHYLLIS OLIVER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
