Cases 1 - 10 of 15
FLORES v. HUDSON COUNTY BOARD OF FREEHOLDERS et al
as 2:2024cv06674
Plaintiff:
JASON FLORES
Defendant:
HUDSON COUNTY BOARD OF FREEHOLDERS, BECKY SCOTT and OFC. JOHN DOE 1-3
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
FERMAN v. FLORES et al
as 2:2023cv16017
Plaintiff:
EVIN FERMAN
Defendant:
DAVID FLORES, DOCTOR, BECKY SCOTT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HALL v. HICKS et al
as 1:2023cv01752
Plaintiff:
SIVAJI HALL
Defendant:
MARCUS O. HICKS, BRUCE DAVIS, JAMES STIGLIANO and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
FLORES v. HUDSON COUNTY CORRECTIONAL CENTER
as 2:2022cv01601
Plaintiff:
CARLOS FLORES
Defendant:
HUDSON COUNTY CORRECTIONAL CENTER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
FLORES v. CAMDEN COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 1:2021cv09120
Defendant:
DIRECTOR DAVID S OWENS, CORRECTIONS OFFICER BAILEY, SERGEANT TIFFANY DEANGELIS and others
Plaintiff:
CARMEN FLORES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ANSARI v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 1:2019cv13576
Defendant:
FELIPE MARTINEZ, IAN CONNORS, V. FLORES and others
Plaintiff:
AZIZI ANSARI
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
AZIZI v. MARTINEZ et al
as 1:2018cv17568
Defendant:
M.D. M.D. CARVAJAL, MS. RINCON, C. SHILLIDAY and others
Plaintiff:
ANSARI AZIZI
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
AZCONA v. FLORES et al
as 3:2018cv05108
Plaintiff:
DANIEL AZCONA
Defendant:
ALEX FLORES, RAYMOND QUICK and THE NEW BRUNSWICK POLICE DEPARTMENT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
FLORES v. GREENE et al
as 2:2016cv00901
Plaintiff:
SAMUEL FLORES
Defendant:
CHARLES GREENE, ALFARO ORTIZ, ESSEX COUNTY CORRECTIONAL ADMINISTRATION and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
FLORES v. UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL et al
as 1:2014cv00461
Plaintiff:
ERIC FLORES
Defendant:
UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL and FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
