Cases 1 - 10 of 866
Symonette v. Governor Of Florida et al
as 3:2024cv01313
Defendant:
Judge Bertila Soto, Judge Lawson, Daniel Palardy and others
Plaintiff:
Vedrick LaMonte Symonette
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Bonilla v. Mendez
as 2:2024cv03514
Plaintiff:
Steven Wayne Bonilla, VEXATIOUS LITIGANT
Defendant:
John A. Mendez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Bonilla v. Mendez
as 2:2024cv03517
Plaintiff:
Steven Wayne Bonilla, VEXATIOUS LITIGANT
Defendant:
John A. Mendez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Bonilla v. Mendez
as 2:2024cv03476
Defendant:
John A. Mendez
Plaintiff:
Steven Wayne Bonilla, VEXATIOUS LITIGANT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Bonilla v. Mendez et al
as 2:2024cv03459
Plaintiff:
Steven Wayne Bonilla, VEXATIOUS LITIGANT
Defendant:
Chi Soo Kim and John A. Mendez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Koch v. County of Monterey et al
as 3:2024cv08415
Defendant:
Commander Phillips, Deputy Mendez, Deputy Pazozo and others
Plaintiff:
Mark F. Koch
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Brown v. Martino et al
as 2:2024cv13092
Defendant:
Berno, B. Novax, Mendez and others
Plaintiff:
Robert Taylor Brown
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
(PC) Bonilla, VEXATIOUS LITIGANT v. Mendez et al
as 2:2024cv03094
Petitioner:
Steven Wayne Bonilla, VEXATIOUS LITIGANT
Defendant:
Chi Soo Kim and John A. Mendez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Bonilla v. Mendez
as 2:2024cv02857
Plaintiff:
Steven Wayne Bonilla, VEXATIOUS LITIGANT
Defendant:
John A. Mendez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Bonilla v. Mendez et al
as 2:2024cv02858
Defendant:
Chi Soo Kim and John A. Mendez
Plaintiff:
Steven Wayne Bonilla, VEXATIOUS LITIGANT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
