Cases 1 - 10 of 25
Monzon v. Bowles et al
as 1:2024cv00226
Plaintiff:
Roman Sebastian Monzon
Defendant:
Kemsy Bowles and Kevin Punturi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bowles v. Unknown
as 2:2024cv00144
Plaintiff:
Michael Bowles
Defendant:
Unknown
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lumpkin v. Virginia Department Of Corrections et al
as 3:2024cv00053
Plaintiff:
Christopher Dewayne Lumpkin
Defendant:
Virginia Department Of Corrections, Kemsy Bowles, K.T. Punturi and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Brown v. Bowles
as 1:2024cv00230
Plaintiff:
James L. Brown
Defendant:
Kemsy Bowles
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Stewart v. Streeval et al
as 7:2023cv00766
Plaintiff:
Louis A. Stewart
Defendant:
Warden Streeval, Asst. Warden, Capt. Bowles and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Price v. Streeval et al
as 7:2023cv00755
Plaintiff:
Sean Price
Defendant:
Warden Streeval, Asst. Warden, Capt. Bowles and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Price v. Streeval et al
as 7:2023cv00754
Plaintiff:
Sean Price
Defendant:
Warden Streeval, Asst. Warden, Capt. Bowles and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Krug v. Clarke et al
as 2:2023cv00678
Plaintiff:
Christopher Brian Krug
Defendant:
Mr. Harold Clarke, Ms. Beth Cabell, Mr. Kemsy Bowles and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ryland v. Director of Federal Bureau of Prison(s) et al
as 7:2023cv00581
Plaintiff:
Corey R Ryland
Defendant:
Director of Federal Bureau of Prison(s), North Central Regional Director, J.C. Streeval and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Santiago v. Streeval et al
as 7:2023cv00064
Plaintiff:
Marcos F. Santiago
Defendant:
J. C. Streeval, Dye, Calton and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
