Cases 1 - 10 of 33
Bradbury et al v. Scott et al
as 2:2023cv02355
Plaintiff:
William F. Bradbury, Jr., Danny E. Starner, Christopher Ford and others
Defendant:
Ohio Department of Rehabilitation and Correction (ODRC), JPay/Securus Technologies, Viapath Technologies and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Sanchez-Rivera v. Garza et al
as 4:2023cv00642
Plaintiff:
Carlos Sanchez-Rivera
Defendant:
Warden Garza, Counselor Betos, Case Manager Roundtree and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Davenport et al v. The State of Ohio et al
as 2:2022cv04419
Plaintiff:
Carlos Davenport and United States Of America
Defendant:
The State of Ohio and Franklin County of Ohio
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Miller et al v. Cicone
as 4:2021cv02292
Plaintiff:
Brian Miller, Sr.
Defendant:
C.O. Echenrod and Attorney Carlos Cicone
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Richardson v. Mohr et al
as 2:2020cv04141
Plaintiff:
Carlos Richardson
Defendant:
Steven Gause, Gary Mohr, Jeffery Noble and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bayon v. North East Ohio Core Civic (NEOCC) et al
as 4:2020cv00551
Plaintiff:
Carlos Bayon
Defendant:
North East Ohio Core Civic (NEOCC), US Marshals, USA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith v. State of Ohio et al
as 2:2020cv00784
Defendant:
Fairfield Sheriff Department, R Kyle Witt, State of Ohio and others
Plaintiff:
Carlos Montez Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Savoca v. O'Neill et al
as 1:2019cv00014
Defendant:
Josh Hank, Jack Remally, Gary Arbeswsek and others
Plaintiff:
Thomas James Savoca
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Stewart v. Midock et al
as 5:2018cv02686
Defendant:
Stark County Sheriff's Dept., Charles Saler, Bryan McWilliams and others
Plaintiff:
Maurice Stewart
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rodriguez v. Garcia
as 3:2018cv01685
Defendant:
Carlos A. Garcia
Plaintiff:
Francisco Rodriguez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
