Cases 1 - 10 of 37
Kennedy v. Bryant et al
as 4:2017cv00142
Plaintiff:
Soloman S. Kennedy
Defendant:
Phil Bryant, Haley Barabour, Tamara Hall and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lafayette v. Epps et al
as 4:2015cv00098
Plaintiff:
Anthony Lafayette
Defendant:
Christopher B. Epps, David Petrie, Terry and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Brown v. Brady et al
as 4:2015cv00035
Plaintiff:
Louis David Brown
Defendant:
Vanita Brady, Mississippi Department of Corrections, Christopher B. Epps and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Spearman v. Epps et al
as 4:2014cv00173
Plaintiff:
Duane W. Spearman
Defendant:
Christopher B. Epps, Earnest Lee, Richard Pennington and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Boyd v. Epps et al
as 4:2014cv00111
Plaintiff:
Terence One Boyd
Defendant:
Christopher B. Epps and John A. Gregory
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Alexander et al v. Mississippi Department of Corrections et al
as 3:2014cv00208
Plaintiff:
Craig Alexander , Robert Anderson , Orves Baker and others
Defendant:
Mississippi Department of Corrections , Christopher B. Epps , Mississippi Parole Board and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bradley (DO NOT FILE) v. Epps et al
as 4:2014cv00013
Plaintiff:
Mondric Bradley (DO NOT FILE)
Defendant:
Christopher B. Epps, Malcom McMillian, Kay Washington and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Alexander v. Lee et al
as 4:2013cv00245
Plaintiff:
John Peyton Alexander, II
Defendant:
Earnest Lee, Robert Sturdivant, Faye Noel and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith v. Epps
as 3:2013cv00248
Plaintiff:
Cardale Neilus Smith
Defendant:
Christopher B. Epps
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Willis v. Evans et al
as 4:2013cv00163
Plaintiff:
Derrick Willis
Defendant:
Charles Doug Evans, Clyde Hill, Clarence E. Morgan, III and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
