Cases 1 - 10 of 23
DAKER v. WARD et al
as 5:2022cv00341
Plaintiff:
WASEEM DAKER
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER TIMOTHY WARD, GREGORY DOZIER, HOMER BRYSON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
KIDD v. DOUGHERTY COUNTY JAIL et al
as 1:2022cv00111
Plaintiff:
VIRGLE CLYDE KIDD
Defendant:
DOUGHERTY COUNTY JAIL, KEVIN SPROUL, KEN OSTRANDER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lynch v. Brasher et al
as 1:2020cv02690
Defendant:
Larry David Wolfe, Ashley L. Culberson, Michael D. Mann and others
Plaintiff:
Raoul Lynch
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
DAKER v. WARD et al
as 7:2020cv00089
Defendant:
CLYDE ALLEN, LISA FOUNTAIN, JACK KOON and others
Plaintiff:
WASEEM DAKER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
KING v. EMMONS et al
as 7:2019cv00207
Defendant:
Cert Officer WILLIAMS, Warden SHAWN EMMONS, Officer J SMITH and others
Plaintiff:
COREY KING
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
REDMON v. SHROPSHIRE et al
as 7:2019cv00125
Defendant:
CLYDE ALLEN, RALPH SHROPSHIRE, Capt JIMMY MILES and others
Plaintiff:
OTIS REDMON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
NEWBERRY v. OWENS et al
as 1:2018cv00166
Defendant:
SGT OWENS, SGT CLYDE, DO OFFICER JENKINS and others
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY NEWBERRY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HOLLAND v. MCLAUGHLIN et al
as 5:2016cv00331
Plaintiff:
CLYDE FRANKLIN HOLLAND
Defendant:
GREGORY MCLAUGHLIN, ROBINSON, FYE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
JONES et al v. CAPE et al
as 5:2014cv00145
Plaintiff:
CLYDE KENNARD JONES, DARON THOMAS, MILTON THOMAS and others
Defendant:
WILLIAM BILLY CAPE , DAVID E MORGAN, III , THERESE S BARNES and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Torres v. United States of America et al
as 1:2010cv02738
Plaintiff:
Jaime Torres
Defendant:
United States of America, Federal Bureau of Prisons, Unknown Sheriff of Fulton County, Georgia and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
