Cases 1 - 10 of 22
Earnest Woods, II v. Darrell Adams, et al
as 18-15410
Plaintiff - Appellant:
EARNEST CASSELL WOODS II
Defendant - Appellee:
DARRELL ADAMS, Warden at Corcoran State Prison, MAURICE JUNIOUS, Chief Deputy Warden at CCI, NICHOLS and others
Dotson v. Adams et al
as 1:2017cv01199
Plaintiff:
Edwina Dotson
Defendant:
Darrel Adams, Scott Kernan, Robert Mitchell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Donna M.B. Anderson v. Adams et al
as 1:2016cv01931
Plaintiff:
Donna M.B. Anderson
Defendant:
Darrell Adams, Mary Anne Di Vincenzo and Scott Kernan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Montano v. Adams et al
as 1:2015cv00452
Plaintiff:
Antonio V. Montano
Defendant:
Darrel Adams and Jerry Brown
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Earnest Woods, II v. Darrell Adams, et al
as 14-16335
Plaintiff - Appellant:
EARNEST CASSELL WOODS, II
Defendant - Appellee:
DARRELL ADAMS, MAURICE JUNIOUS, NICHOLS and others
Antonio V. Montano v. Darrel Adams et al
as 2:2014cv00323
Defendant:
Darrel Adams, Darrel Adams, Jerry Brown and others
Plaintiff:
Antonio V. Montano
Woods v. Adams et al
as 1:2013cv00621
Plaintiff:
Earnest Cassell Woods, II
Defendant:
Darrell Adams, Maurice Junious, Nichols and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lonnie Williams, Jr. v. P. Rodriguez, et al
as 12-17153
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LONNIE CLARK WILLIAMS, Jr.
Defendant - Appellee:
P. RODRIGUEZ, Correctional Officer, DARRELL ADAMS, Executive Warden, BERRY, Sergeant for Los Angeles County Sheriff's Department and others
Baldhosky v. Hubbard et al
as 1:2012cv01200
Plaintiff:
Raymond Baldhosky
Defendant:
Susan Hubbard, Darrel Adams, J. Wang and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lonnie Williams, Jr. v. P. Rodriguez, et al
as 12-16431
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LONNIE CLARK WILLIAMS, Jr.
Defendant - Appellee:
P. RODRIGUEZ, Correctional Officer, DARRELL ADAMS, Executive Warden, BERRY, Sergeant for Los Angeles County Sheriff's Department and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
