Cases 1 - 10 of 761
Hicks v. Dotson et al
as 7:2024cv00360
Plaintiff:
Deonta J. Hicks
Defendant:
Chadwick Dotson, David Anderson, Joseph D. Bateman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Meyers v. Rosch et al
as 2:2024cv00348
Plaintiff:
David Meyers
Defendant:
Kyle Rosch, Chadwick Dotson, S. Soloman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ali v. Novak
as 3:2024cv00397
Plaintiff:
Abir Ali
Defendant:
Judge David J. Novak
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cruey v. Southwest Virginia Regional Jail - Tazewell
as 7:2024cv00326
Plaintiff:
David Lee Cruey, II
Defendant:
Southwest Virginia Regional Jail - Tazewell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
AlBritton v. Commonwealth of Virginia et al
as 7:2024cv00283
Plaintiff:
DeVinche Javon AlBritton
Defendant:
Commonwealth of Virginia, Counselor Kayla Mallory, David Robinson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Watson v. Dotson et al
as 7:2024cv00268
Plaintiff:
Darrell N. Watson
Defendant:
Chadwick S. Dotson, Warden Rick White, Captain Gilbert and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Robinson v. Halmolton
as 7:2024cv00255
Plaintiff:
David Robinson
Defendant:
Chad Halmolton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Moultrie v. Robinson
as 3:2024cv00256
Plaintiff:
Jules Moultrie
Defendant:
A. David Robinson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Crosby v. Collins et al
as 7:2024cv00234
Plaintiff:
Brandon L. Crosby
Defendant:
Larry Collins, David Robinson, Randall Mathena and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rivera v. Anderson et al
as 7:2024cv00224
Plaintiff:
Denis Alberto Rivera
Defendant:
David Anderson, Harold W. Clarke, Randall C. Mathena and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
