Cases 1 - 10 of 21
Stuckey v. Biden et al
as 3:2024cv00067
Plaintiff:
Tommy C. Stuckey, Jr.
Defendant:
Joe Biden, Al Gore, Jimmy Dean Anderson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Wheater v. Gallaird et al
as 3:2023cv00319
Plaintiff:
Billy Wheater
Defendant:
Karl Gallaird, Brandon Wilbanks, Sherry Adams and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Boyd v. Allegiance Specialty Hospital of Greenville et al
as 4:2023cv00056
Plaintiff:
Dean C. Boyd
Defendant:
Allegiance Specialty Hospital of Greenville and Vernell Herzog
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Boyd v. Hughes
as 4:2023cv00035
Plaintiff:
Dean Boyd
Defendant:
Misty Hughes
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Taylor v. Favre et al
as 1:2022cv00215
Plaintiff:
Shannon Dean Taylor
Defendant:
Casey Favre and Brandon Zeringue
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Boyd v. Thomas, et al
as 4:2022cv00113
Plaintiff:
Dean C. Boyd
Defendant:
Vickie Thomas, N.P. Miranda Shegog, P.A. Shauna Nguyen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Boyd v. Advert Security Contractor in Pearl Mississippi
as 4:2022cv00065
Plaintiff:
Dean C. Boyd
Defendant:
Advert Security Contractor in Pearl Mississippi and Advert Security Contractor in Pearl Mississippi doing business as Advert Group USA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Boyd v. Collier et al
as 4:2022cv00010
Plaintiff:
Dean C. Boyd
Defendant:
Dewayne Collier and C.N.A. Reginald
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Boyd v. Jenkins et al
as 4:2021cv00135
Plaintiff:
Dean C. Boyd
Defendant:
Denisha Jenkins and Nurse Money
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Boyd v. Spencer et al
as 4:2021cv00035
Plaintiff:
Dean C. Boyd
Defendant:
Medical Doctor J. Glisson and Barry Spencer
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
