Cases 1 - 10 of 10
TYSON v. DUFFY et al
as 2:2023cv01676
Plaintiff:
TIA TYSON
Defendant:
SHAUN DUFFY and MATTHEW P LALLY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
CRAMER v. DUFFY et al
as 1:2019cv00083
Defendant:
SGT. MROZEK and LT. DUFFY
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM CRAMER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Edrington v. Mahally et al
as 3:2016cv02339
Plaintiff:
Thomas Lee Edrington
Defendant:
Larry Mahally, Rebecca Mooney, C.J. McKeown and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
EVANS v. MERCY SUBURBAN HOSPITAL et al
as 2:2016cv03426
Plaintiff:
JAMES D. EVANS
Defendant:
MERCY SUBURBAN HOSPITAL, TOWNE MANOR EAST NURSING HOME & REHABILITATION CENTER, MONTGOMERY COUNTY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
RAMEY v. GEORGE W. HILL CORRECTIONAL FACILITY et al
as 2:2015cv01431
Plaintiff:
ROBERT MARQUIS RAMEY
Defendant:
GEORGE W. HILL CORRECTIONAL FACILITY, COMMUNITY EDUCATION CENTER, JOHN A. REILLY, JR. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
JOHNSON v. WZOREK et al
as 2:2012cv02572
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY JOHNSON
Defendant:
ANTHONY J. WZOREK, SPECIAL AGENT STEPHEN J. HEANEY, SPECIAL AGENT SCOTT DUFFY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
ROBINSON v. MCQUIGAN et al
as 2:2012cv00899
Plaintiff:
DEMONT A. ROBINSON
Defendant:
KEVIN MCQUIGAN, TIMOTHY DIQREGOIO, FITZ DUFFY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
GLOVER v. GOOB et al
as 2:2011cv01953
Plaintiff:
JAMES LEE GLOVER
Defendant:
GOOB, EDWARD A. FALLERT, DUFFY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rolle v. United States of America et al
as 1:2010cv00587
Plaintiff:
Fredrick Rolle
Defendant:
United States of America, David G. Larimer, Marion W. Payson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Hendal v. Chalmers et al
as 1:2007cv02134
Plaintiff:
Michael J. Hendal
Defendant:
Craig Chalmers, Kevin Bishop, Hussy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
