Cases 1 - 10 of 19
Jensen v. State of Washington et al
as 2:2016cv01963
Plaintiff:
William Frederick Jensen
Defendant:
State of Washington, Jay R Inslee, Eugene J Medutis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Navarro v. Westphal et al
as 4:2016cv05094
Plaintiff:
Pedro Navarro
Defendant:
A Westphal, Victoria Tapia, Jackie Fluaith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Perez v. Warner et al
as 3:2015cv05530
Plaintiff:
Daniel Perez, Jr
Defendant:
Bernard Warner, Ron Haynes, Roy Gonzalez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Slack v. Wright et al
as 3:2015cv05270
Plaintiff:
Tommie Slack
Defendant:
Earl X. Wright, Elaine Farr, John Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Baumgardner v. Miller-Stout et al
as 2:2015cv00045
Plaintiff:
Troy L Baumgardner
Defendant:
Maggie Miller-Stout, Bernard Warner, Earl X Wright and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Barstad v. Department of Corrections et al
as 2:2014cv00523
Plaintiff:
James Barstad
Defendant:
Earl X. Wright, Mike Watkins, Roy Gonzalez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
James Barstad v. Department of Corrections Stat, et al
as 13-35338
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JAMES BENJAMIN BARSTAD
Defendant - Appellee:
DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS STATE OF WASHINGTON, BERNARD EDWARD WARNER, DAN PACHOLKE and others
Bovan v. Brazington et al
as 2:2013cv00138
Plaintiff:
Jamar Andre Bovan
Defendant:
Rita Brazington, Maggie Miller-Stout, Earl X Wright and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Reed v. Byrnes et al
as 2:2013cv00081
Plaintiff:
Matthew Reed
Defendant:
Donna Byrnes, Garvin, Rebecca Dyson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Luis Camejo-Rodriguez v. MCC Supt Margaret Gilbert, et al
as 13-35111
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LUIS A CAMEJO-RODRIGUEZ
Defendant - Appellee:
MCC SUPT MARGARET GILBERT, SCOTT FRAKES, BERNARD WARNER, COG HQ and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
