Cases 1 - 10 of 85
Pryor v. Chestnut, et al
as 7:2023cv00541
Plaintiff:
Fred E. Pryor, Jr.
Defendant:
Middle River Regional Jail, Ms. Chestnut, Ms. Lynda Mood and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Napier v. Ohai et al
as 7:2023cv00098
Plaintiff:
Walter Randolph Napier, Jr.
Defendant:
Paul C. Ohai, MD, A. David Robinson, Harold Clarke and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Carrusco v. Federal Bureau of Prisons
as 7:2021cv00464
Plaintiff:
Fred Carrusco
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Prisons, John Doe #1, John Doe #2 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Yahweh v. Commonwealth of Virginia et al
as 1:2020cv01105
Plaintiff:
Yeshua Emanuel Yahweh, Robert Gabriel Love, Gabriel Alexander Antonio and others
Defendant:
Ms. Ansah, Foe Two, Carl K. Kester and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hearn v. Leabough et al
as 3:2020cv00618
Defendant:
L.J. Leabough, E. Blackwell and S. Poarch
Plaintiff:
Fred T. Hearn
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
LeGrand v. Blair Meyers Law Firm et al
as 1:2019cv01464
Plaintiff:
Martell A. LeGrand
Defendant:
Risperdal Team Fred and Whole Faculty Staff, Blair Meyers Law Firm and Arnold Anitkin Law Firm
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mateen v. Clarke et al
as 7:2019cv00620
Defendant:
Ms. Happer, Mr. D/S Collins, B.L. Hughes and others
Plaintiff:
Khalif Abdul Mateen
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Whitlock v. Clarke et al
as 7:2019cv00621
Defendant:
Ms. Happer, Mr. D/S Collins, B.L. Hughes and others
Plaintiff:
Waverly Whitlock
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Holley v. Clarke et al
as 7:2019cv00623
Defendant:
Ms. Happer, Mr. D/S Collins, B.L. Hughes and others
Plaintiff:
Garfield W. Holley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dammones v. Clarke et al
as 7:2019cv00622
Defendant:
Ms. Happer, Mr. D/S Collins, B.L. Hughes and others
Plaintiff:
Christopher Dammones
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
