Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Kershaw v. Bureau of Prisons
as 4:2022cv04670
Plaintiff:
Gabriel Kershaw, Gabriel L. Kershaw and Gabriel Z. Kershaw
Defendant:
Bureau of Prisons
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, Federal Filers (Bivens)
South Carolina Department of Social Services v. Wright et al
as 4:2022cv01853
Plaintiff:
South Carolina Department of Social Services
Defendant:
Gabrielle Wright and Darian Williams
Interested Party:
Nichole Harris Bey and Durelle El Bey
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Crawford v. Warden Nelson et al
as 9:2020cv02139
Plaintiff:
Lawrence L Crawford, Johah Gabriel and Jahjah T Tishbite
Defendant:
The S.C.D.C Muslim Chaplains, Warden Nelson, S.C.D.C and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
McCray v. S.C. Department of Corrections, The et al
as 1:2019cv01574
Defendant:
S.C. Department of Corrections, The, Lt. Brown, Warden Shepard and others
Plaintiff:
Ron Santa McCray
Intervenor Plaintiff:
Lawrence L. Crawford and Jonah Gabriel Jahjah T. Tishbile
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lawrence L. Crawford v. Judge J. Newman et al
as 9:2019cv01400
Plaintiff:
Lawrence L. Crawford, Johah Gabriel and Jahjah T Tishbite
Defendant:
Judge J. Newman, Capt. Brighthart, General Counsel Annie Rumler and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kershaw v. Abraham et al
as 4:2018cv01176
Plaintiff:
Gabriel L. Kershaw
Defendant:
Larry Abraham, Lt. McArthur, Vivian Clar and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Shadoan v. Florence County Detention Center Medical Department
as 8:2012cv02908
Plaintiff:
Guy Gabriel Shadoan
Defendant:
Florence County Detention Center Medical Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Randolph v. Jeffery et al
as 2:2008cv03492
Plaintiff:
Gabriel Randolph
Defendant:
Officer Jeffery, C William, Ben Outlaw and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
