Civil Rights Cases filed in Texas
Cases 1 - 10 of 24
Gill v. Wescott et al
as 2:2024cv00081
Plaintiff: Michael Todd Gill
Defendant: NFN Wescott, NFN Mendoza and NFN Wilson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Emmons v. Gilles et al
as 7:2020cv00185
Defendant: Midland County, Captain FNU Grahm, Sheriff Deputy FNU Gillette and others
Plaintiff: Steven Audis Emmons
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Shaw v. State of Texas et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2020cv00561
Defendant: U.T.M.B., Al W. Schorre, Jr., State of Texas and others
Plaintiff: Oscar L. Shaw
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gill v. Alexander et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2020cv00115
Respondent: Kailey Smiles, Ms. FNU Murrack, Robert D Coffey and others
Plaintiff: Rudolfo Gill
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Vatin v. Shaw et al
as 6:2018cv00398
Defendant: Unknown Shaw and Unknown Gill
Plaintiff: Kendrick Dondray Vatin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Coomer v. Roth et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2018cv00121
Petitioner: Tracey Harris Coomer
Respondent: Mark Roth, Warden Arnold, Daisha B Simmons and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Coomer v. Roth et al
as 1:2018cv00298
Plaintiff: Tracey Harris Coomer
Defendant: Mark Roth, Warden Arnold, Daisha B Simmons and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gill v. Muhammad-Bey et al
as 5:2018cv00030
Plaintiff: DeAndre Gill
Defendant: Iman Muhammad-Bey, F. Kynard, K. Pinney and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cook v. Gilles et al
as 7:2017cv00148
Plaintiff: John Lee Cook
Defendant: George D. Jody Gilles and Gary Painter
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Awan v. Harmon et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2017cv00130
Plaintiff: Khalid Awan
Defendant: DJ Harmon, A Gill, Juan D Constillo and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?