Cases 1 - 10 of 16
Davis v. Thomas et al
as 5:2018cv10075
Plaintiff:
Jeanette D Davis
Defendant:
Renee Thomas, Millicent Warren, Alan Greason and others
ROBERT MARTIN, as Conservator for DARLENE MARTIN, a Protected Person v. Michigan Department of Corrections et al
as 2:2017cv11845
Defendant:
Michigan Department of Corrections, LT. MICHAEL NELSON, SGT. EARL FISHER and others
Plaintiff:
ROBERT MARTIN, as Conservator for DARLENE MARTIN, a Protected Person
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Martin et al v. Lowe et al
as 2:2016cv11075
Defendant:
Wanda Lowe , Traci Maupins , Paul McPherson and others
Plaintiff:
Robert Martin and Darlene Martin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Smith v. Michigan Department of Corrections et al
as 4:2015cv11910
Plaintiff:
Jack Smith
Defendant:
Michigan Department of Corrections, Barbara Sampson, Ted Hammon and others
Moon et al v. Warren et al
as 2:2014cv10195
Plaintiff:
Resheda Moon, Iesha Northington, Ursula Heard and others
Defendant:
Millicent Warren, Daniel Heyns, Syllvia McQueen and others
Hunter #229916 v. Snyder et al
as 1:2013cv00351
Plaintiff:
Carl Hunter #229916
Defendant:
Rick Snyder, Daniel H. Heyns, Jane Price and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith v. Michigan Department of Corrections et al
as 2:2011cv15342
Plaintiff:
Jack Smith
Defendant:
Michigan Department of Corrections, Barbara Sampson, Ted Hammon and others
White #198559 v. Berrios
as 2:2011cv00148
Plaintiff:
Brian White #198559
Defendant:
Miguel Berrios, Ted Hammon and Elizabeth Clement
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hunter #229916 v. Michigan Parole Board, et al
as 2:2011cv00122
Plaintiff:
Carl Hunter #229916
Defendant:
Michigan Parole Board and Ted Hammon
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dionne v. Sampson et al
as 2:2011cv10602
Plaintiff:
Michael Dionne
Defendant:
Barbara Sampson, J Atterberry, M Berrios and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
