Cases 1 - 10 of 18
Blanchette v. Ward et al
as 7:2023cv00002
Plaintiff:
Blair A. Blanchette
Defendant:
Ingrid Ward, Francis Grace, Tammy Nauit and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Moses v. City of San Antonio et al
as 5:2018cv01302
Defendant:
City of San Antonio, Bexar County, FNU Smith and others
Plaintiff:
Maurice A. Moses, Sr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Alexander v. Birnel et al
as 6:2016cv00333
Plaintiff:
William P. Alexander
Defendant:
Bruce Armstrong, Lisa M. Birnel, Gilbert Campuzano and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - 42:1983 Civil Rights
Phillips v. Arlington Police Department et al
as 4:2016cv00661
Plaintiff:
Adrian Devone Phillips
Defendant:
Arlington Police Department, NFN Hernandez, NFN Jensen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jensen v. Thaler, Director of TDCJ-ID et al
as 4:2013cv02390
Plaintiff:
Martin B Jensen
Defendant:
Rick Thaler, Betty Williams and University of Texas Medical Branch (UTMB)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jensen v. Thaler, Director of TDCJ-ID et al
as 3:2013cv03113
Plaintiff:
Martin B Jensen
Defendant:
Rick Thaler, Betty Williams and University of Texas Medical Branch (UTMB)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Parrish v. Scherlen et al
as 2:2012cv00167
Plaintiff:
Michael Wayne Parrish
Defendant:
Justin Scherlen, Neil Jensen and Joshua Woodburn
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jensen v. North et al
as 9:2011cv00156
Plaintiff:
Pete Jensen
Defendant:
North, Bell and Roberts
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jensen v. Sgt North et al
as 9:2011cv00151
Defendant:
Sgt North, Warden Bell and Male Nurse Martin
Plaintiff:
Pete Jensen
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jensen v. Sgt North et al
as 4:2011cv03216
Defendant:
Sgt North, Warden Bell and Male Nurse Martin
Plaintiff:
Pete Jensen
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
