Cases 1 - 10 of 17
David v. Hodges et al
as 6:2023cv00405
Defendant:
Angela Cacey, FNU Fisk, Dustin Hodges and others
Plaintiff:
Jerome Adrian David
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson v. McCurdy et al
as 6:2023cv00058
Petitioner:
Marylin Monae Porter and Lamone M Johnson
Respondent:
Joel McCurdy, Utilizaton Review Committee, Kim Hall and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McCoy v. Farris
as 6:2022cv00350
Plaintiff:
Jimmie McCoy, III
Defendant:
Jim Farris and Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lay, et al v. Crow, et al
as 22-6112
Plaintiff / Appellant:
WADE LAY, by and through his next friend Rhonda Kemp
Plaintiff:
BRENDA E. ANDREW, RONSON KYLE BUSH, JEMAINE MONTEIL CANNON and others
Defendant / Appellee:
SCOTT CROW, RANDY CHANDLER, BETTY GESELL and others
Coddington, et al v. Crow, et al
as 22-6100
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JAMES A. CODDINGTON, BENJAMIN R. COLE, CARLOS CUESTA-RODRIGUEZ and others
Defendant / Appellee:
SCOTT CROW, RANDY CHANDLER, BETTY GESELL and others
Grant, et al v. Crow, et al
as 22-6012
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DONALD ANTHONY GRANT and GILBERT RAY POSTELLE
Plaintiff:
JAMES A. CODDINGTON, BENJAMIN R. COLE, CARLOS CUESTA-RODRIGUEZ and others
Defendant / Appellee:
SCOTT CROW, RANDY CHANDLER, BETTY GESELL and others
Roppolo v. Farris
as 6:2021cv00259
Plaintiff:
Paul Roppolo
Defendant:
Jim Farris
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Griffin v. Ceasar et al
as 6:2020cv00323
Defendant:
Vickie Ceasar and Jim Farris
Plaintiff:
Cedric Griffin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Manning v. Farris et al
as 6:2018cv00373
Defendant:
Jim Farris, Romon Jones and Linzi Custer
Plaintiff:
Johnathan Manning
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ali v. Jones, et al
as 17-6050
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MURTAZA ALI
Defendant - Appellee:
JUSTIN JONES, Director, ROBERT PATTON, Director, MARK KNUTSON, Director's Designee and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
