Cases 1 - 10 of 257
Lawson v. Tong et al
as 3:2024cv01016
Plaintiff:
Jeremy M. Lawson
Defendant:
William Tong, Sandra Arenas, Edward Miner Lamont, Jr and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lawson v. Lamont et al
as 3:2024cv00917
Plaintiff:
Jeremy M. Lawson
Defendant:
Ned Lamont, William Tong, Matt Pitter and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mayo v. Spotten et al
as 3:2024cv00884
Plaintiff:
Christopher J Mayo
Defendant:
Kerri Spotten, Jane Doe, Marissa Goldberg and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Petteway v. Parsons et al
as 3:2024cv00763
Plaintiff:
Christopher Q. Petteway
Defendant:
Parsons, Yasdel Moya, Landolina and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Breton v. Doe et al
as 3:2024cv00713
Plaintiff:
Randy Breton, Sr
Defendant:
John Doe and Jane Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gray v. Rogers et al
as 3:2024cv00690
Plaintiff:
Bennie Gray, Jr
Defendant:
Cornelius Rogers, Knotts, John Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cook v. Mastroianni et al
as 3:2024cv00426
Plaintiff:
Andrew Cook
Defendant:
James Mastroianni, Scott Meikle, Ryan Froehlich and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hill v. Gardner et al
as 3:2024cv00180
Plaintiff:
Tyquan Hill
Defendant:
Gardner, John Doe and Jane Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rosegreen v. Lloyd et al
as 3:2023cv01632
Plaintiff:
Lamont Rosegreen
Defendant:
Lloyd, Curney, Angel Quiros and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dorlette v. City of Stamford et al
as 3:2023cv01589
Plaintiff:
Faroulh Dorlette
Defendant:
City of Stamford, Christopher Baker, John/Jane Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343 Violation of Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
