Cases 1 - 10 of 36
Maurice Walker v. Mary Roche, et al
as 14-3353
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Maurice Walker
Defendant - Appellee:
Mary Roche, Director of Office of Victim Programs, John Fayram, Warden and John Baldwin, Department of Corrections
Sean Krier v. Jerry Connelly, et al
as 14-2618
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Sean Edward Krier
Defendant:
Iowa Department of Corrections, John Baldwin, John Fayram, Warden and others
Defendant - Appellee:
Jerry Connelly, Health Services Director and Dr. Richter
Walker v. Roche et al
as 1:2014cv00082
Plaintiff:
Maurice Walker
Defendant:
Mary Roche, John Fayram and John Baldwin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bear et al v. Dietch et al
as 1:2014cv00005
Plaintiff:
Archie Bear, Duane Yates, Alex Tejeda and others
Defendant:
Tracy Dietch, John Fayram, John Baldwin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wright v. Fayram et al
as 1:2013cv00078
Plaintiff:
Duane Wright
Defendant:
John Fayram, William Spersledge and Tracy Dietsch
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Krier v. Iowa Department of Corrections et al
as 1:2013cv00013
Plaintiff:
Sean Edward Krier
Defendant:
Iowa Department of Corrections, John Baldwin, John Fayram and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Hardisty v. Baldwin et al
as 1:2013cv00004
Plaintiff:
Justin Hardisty
Defendant:
John Baldwin, Jerry Burtruff, John Fayram and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jackson v. Fayram et al
as 1:2012cv00130
Plaintiff:
Marlin Jackson
Defendant:
John Fayram, David Richter and Linda Boffeli
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Benoit v. Fayram
as 1:2012cv00051
Plaintiff:
Dennis Charles Benoit
Defendant:
John Fayram
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Taylor v. Harms et al
as 1:2012cv00045
Plaintiff:
Dustin James Taylor
Defendant:
Lorie Harms, Jerry Connolly, Cindy Wolmutt and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
