Cases 1 - 10 of 61
Kilman v. Stancil et al
as 1:2023cv01176
Plaintiff:
Tobi Kilman
Defendant:
Andre Stancil, Dean Williams, Rick Raemisch and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith v. Suthers et al
as 3:2022cv00992
Plaintiff:
James D. Smith
Defendant:
John Suthers, f/n/u Elders, f/n//u Holder and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Peters v. May et al
as 1:2019cv02515
Defendant:
Andrew Lower, Steven Klaffkey, Hughs and others
Plaintiff:
Mark C. Peters
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kilman v. Williams et al
as 1:2019cv02265
Defendant:
Tom Clements, Aristedes Zavares, John Suthers and others
Plaintiff:
Tobi Kilman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Aurit v. State of Colorado et al
as 1:2018cv00057
Plaintiff:
Todd Anthony Aurit
Defendant:
State of Colorado, Colorado Department of Corrections, United States and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Felvey v. Suthers, et al
as 17-1033
Plaintiff - Appellant:
KATHERINE STEWART FELVEY
Defendant - Appellee:
MAYOR JOHN SUTHERS, LT. JEFF SHANNON and OFFICER SEAN COLLINS, Crisis Response Team
Felvey v. Colorado Springs Police Dept.
as 1:2016cv02526
Plaintiff:
Katherine Stewart Felvey
Defendant:
John Suthers, Jeff Shanna and Sean Collins
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Himes v. Colorado Dept. of Corrections et al
as 1:2016cv01315
Plaintiff:
Eddie Himes
Defendant:
Colorado Dept. of Corrections, Rick Raemisch, Roger Werholtz and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Atkerson v. Colorado Dept of Corrections et al
as 1:2016cv01102
Defendant:
Colorado Dept of Corrections, Rick Raemisch, Roger Werholtz and others
Plaintiff:
Mark Atkerson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lujan v. Colorado Dept. Corrections et al
as 1:2016cv01105
Plaintiff:
Felix D. Lujan
Defendant:
Colorado Dept. Corrections, Rick Raemisch, Roger Werholtz and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
