Cases 1 - 10 of 23
Files v. Giddens et al
as 2:2020cv00959
Defendant:
Ryan Rumsey, John Edward Rochester, Julian M King and others
Plaintiff:
Earnest James Files, Jr
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Files v. Kilgore et al
as 1:2017cv01881
Plaintiff:
Earnest James Files, Jr
Defendant:
Jimmy Kilgore, Ken Flower, Ron Smith and others
Miscellaneou:
staff attorney 4
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Oden v. King et al
as 1:2017cv01724
Plaintiff:
Damon Eugene Oden
Defendant:
Julian M King, Kelley Johnson, Steven Dale Giddens and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Files v. King et al
as 1:2017cv01632
Plaintiff:
Earnest J Files, Jr
Defendant:
Julian M King, John Edward Rochester, Steven Dale Giddens and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Oden v. Kilgore et al
as 1:2017cv00891
Plaintiff:
Damon Oden
Defendant:
Jimmy Kilgore, Ron Smith, Ken Flowers and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Thompson v. Kilgore et al
as 1:2017cv00840
Plaintiff:
Seth Adam Thompson
Defendant:
Jimmy Kilgore, Ken Flower, Ron Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Fulford v. Fannin et al
as 1:2017cv00703
Plaintiff:
William N. Fulford
Defendant:
Jeb Fannin, Lisa Garrett, Steve Giddens and others
Miscellaneou:
staff attorney 4
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gaddis v. Kilgore et al
as 1:2017cv00640
Plaintiff:
Thomas Gaddis
Defendant:
Jimmy Kilgore, Ron Smith, Ken Flower and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Files v. King et al
as 1:2016cv01952
Plaintiff:
Earnest J Files, Jr
Defendant:
Julian M King, State of Alabama, Steven Dale Giddens and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Files v. Tallapoosa County Narcotics Task Force et al (INMATE 2)
as 3:2016cv00770
Plaintiff:
Earnest J. Files, Jr.
Defendant:
Tallapoosa County Narcotics Task Force, Jimmy Abbett, E. Paul Jones and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
