Cases 1 - 10 of 25
Canada v. State of Minnesota et al
as 0:2023cv02704
Plaintiff:
Shawn Canada
Defendant:
State of Minnesota, Paul Schnell, Andrew Karlsen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Canada v. Haugen et al
as 0:2018cv03182
Defendant:
Jodi Williamson, David Rey Haugen and Laurie Anderson
Plaintiff:
Shawn Canada
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jamison v. Moser et al
as 0:2015cv03307
Plaintiff:
Shawn Jamison
Defendant:
Kevin Moser, Terry Kneizel, Laurie Severson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gilbertson v. Minnesota Department of Human Services et al
as 0:2015cv01563
Plaintiff:
Roger Michael Gilbertson
Defendant:
Minnesota Department of Human Services , Kevin Moser , Dennis Benson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Corscadden v. Jesson et al
as 0:2015cv00050
Plaintiff:
Thomas Gary Corscadden
Defendant:
Lucinda Jesson, Nancy Johnston, Kevin Moser and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Geiger v. Minnesota Department of Human Services et al
as 0:2013cv02140
Plaintiff:
Charles Michael Geiger
Defendant:
Minnesota Department of Human Services, Minnesota Sex Offender Program, Lucinda Jesson and others
DeVillion v. Minnesota Department of Human Services et al
as 0:2013cv02134
Plaintiff:
Kevin John DeVillion
Defendant:
Minnesota Department of Human Services, Minnesota Sex Offender Program, Lucinda Jesson and others
Linehan v. Swanson et al
as 0:2012cv00423
Plaintiff:
Dennis Linehan
Defendant:
Lori Swanson, Dayton, Dennis Benson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Marshall v. Swanson et al
as 0:2012cv00319
Plaintiff:
Robert Alex Marshall
Defendant:
Lori Swanson, Dayton, Dennis Benson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mosby v. Swanson et al
as 0:2012cv00320
Plaintiff:
William Mosby
Defendant:
Lori Swanson, Govenor Dayton, Dennis Benson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
