Cases 1 - 10 of 58
Glover v. Lt. Brown
as 0:2023cv03851
Plaintiff:
Leroy Glover
Defendant:
Lt. Brown
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Glenn v. Peressey et al
as 2:2022cv01617
Plaintiff:
Andres Glenn, Andres L. Glenn, Andres Leroy Glenn and others
Defendant:
Berkeley Government, Jasey Peressey and Bernsly Realoty
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr (Other)
Williams v. Ravenell et al
as 5:2022cv00538
Plaintiff:
Anna Williams
Defendant:
Leroy Ravenell, Santee, City of, Damian Clinton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Brooks v. Berkeley County Sheriff's Office et al
as 2:2021cv04054
Plaintiff:
Altony Brooks
Defendant:
Berkeley County Sheriff's Office, Organgeburg County Sheriff's Office, Tony Bart and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Brooks v. Borghi et al
as 5:2021cv03282
Plaintiff:
Altony Brooks
Defendant:
Kevin O Borghi, Leroy Ravenell, State Fiscal Accountability Insurance Reserve Fund and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Haynes Jr. v. Ravenell et al
as 5:2021cv02076
Plaintiff:
Melvin Shaquille Haynes and Melvin Shaquille Haynes Jr.
Defendant:
Leroy Ravenell, John C Stohes Jr, Lt. Rhodan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dizzley v. Hixson et al
as 2:2020cv02613
Defendant:
Gerogetown County Solicitors Office, Leah B Moody, Ronald Hazzard and others
Plaintiff:
Terron Gerhard Dizzley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Shaw v. Gillespie et al
as 9:2019cv01863
Defendant:
C. Holbrook, R. L. Turner and Richard Gillespie
Plaintiff:
LeRoy Shaw
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Shuler v. South Carolina, State of et al
as 5:2019cv01015
Defendant:
Laquetta Sumpter, Winnifa B. Clark, South Carolina, State of and others
Plaintiff:
Melodie Shuler
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Butler v. Ravenell et al
as 5:2019cv00914
Defendant:
Andrew Hayes and Leroy Ravenell
Plaintiff:
John Henry Butler
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
