Civil Rights Cases filed in Alabama
McQueen v. Mathis We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2022cv00958
Plaintiff: Marcus Dewayne McQueen
Defendant: Erskin Mathis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jackson v. Griffith et al (INMATE 1) We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2021cv00813
Plaintiff: Jalon D. Jackson
Defendant: Charlette Griffith, Louis Colley, Terri Mathis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mathis v. Downs et al (INMATE 1) We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2020cv00498
Defendant: CO Downs, Donald Valenza, Ms. Fears and others
Plaintiff: Raymond Mathis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Files v. Kilgore et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2017cv01881
Plaintiff: Earnest James Files, Jr
Defendant: Jimmy Kilgore, Ken Flower, Ron Smith and others
Miscellaneou: staff attorney 4
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Files v. Tallapoosa County Narcotics Task Force et al (INMATE 2) We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2016cv00770
Plaintiff: Earnest J. Files, Jr.
Defendant: Tallapoosa County Narcotics Task Force, Jimmy Abbett, E. Paul Jones and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lowe v. State of Alabama et al
as 2:2014cv01634
Plaintiff: Cedric De'Von Lowe
Defendant: State of Alabama, Terressa T Pulliam, Jefferson County Sheriff Dept. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mathis v. Price et al
as 7:2010cv00447
Plaintiff: Raymond Mathis
Defendant: Cheryl Price, Miller, Lawston and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mathis v. Binford et al (INMATE1)
as 1:2008cv00609
Plaintiff: Raymond Mathis
Defendant: Henry D. Binford and Matthew C. Lamere
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Mathis v. Woodall (INMATE1) We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2008cv00286
Plaintiff: Raymond Mathis
Defendant: Carla Woodall
Cause Of Action: Federal Question

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?